A Critical Review of the 2012 King James Bible Exhibit at the University of Texas

This short article is the initial in a collection of articles that provide the concepts of my print-on-demand book, “The 4th Day: Why the Bible is Historically Accurate”.

When I was university student, I was introduced to the concept of biblical inerrancy. My priest, Al Jackson of Lakeview Baptist Church in Auburn, Alabama, drove the factor residence that words of God, the Holy bible, was “God-breathed”. He clarified that because the Bible was “God-breathed” it was created likewise as Adam when God breathed life right into male in the book of Genesis. The Holy bible was designed, much like male went to development, when God advised over forty writers exactly what to write. The Scriptures was created in the feeling that the whole book’s objective is the discovery of the messiah of mankind, Jesus Christ. The Bible indicate Christ in really straight methods by giving the details features of his human life. The prophecies of the Old Testament showed he would be born in Bethlehem, via the line of Jesse, and also by a virgin. The spiritual aspects of Christ are mentioned in the signs of the atonement sacrifices where pets were put on an altar and afterwards sprayed with salt, a sign of infinity, to represent the once-and-for-all sacrifice that the Son of God would make on a cross one day. God worked with all this information to point to Christ, God’s plan for guy’s salvation.

Since the time that my priest described these things to me I have taken them to heart and also I have studied the Holy bible with the attitude that the Bible is historically correct along with spiritually right. Traditional Christians have actually embraced this philosophy in every subject covered in the Holy bible except for one, chronology. Chronology, the research study of the historic timeline, has actually been a subject where it appears the Christian area has yielded loss. For whatever reason, Christians in the modern period have actually looked for compromise with scholars, much of whom are downright antagonistic to Christian ideas, to ensure that the timeline of the Scriptures would have the stamp of credibility from historians.

An article in Biblical Archaelogy Review successfully demonstrates the degree of Scriptural incongruity that archeological area can exhibit. Take into consideration a passage from the opening paragraph of a post qualified Minimalists on Parade (Scriptural Archaeology Testimonial, Jan/Feb 2005, Vol 31, No. 1, Page 16-17): “At a recent conference on reconstructing Israelite background kept in Rome, the supposed Biblical minimalist placement was upheld by a number of noticeable scholars. This position is not monolithic, nevertheless, and also different minimal scholars stressed different disagreements. Amongst them:

* The Bible can not be made use of as a historical source. [The position that specifies a Biblical minimalist.]
* Neither can archaeology, which can only inform us whether ancient Israelites ate from a dish 20 or 30 centimeters broad. A background of Israel based on archaeology is useless.

* There was no Exodus.

* The well-known Tel Dan inscription stating David, excavated by Israeli excavator Avraham Biran, is most likely a bogus; and also the Hebrew words in the engraving that checked out “Home [Empire] of David” most likely indicate something else.

* David as well as Solomon are only symbolic characters, unreal characters.

* The Scriptural accounts of the United Kingdom of Judah and also Israel under David as well as Solomon are merely later on forecasts into a far-off mythic past.

* Judah did not also come to be a state up until about a hundred years after David-if he lived.” One scholar stated in this write-up, Giovanni Garbini of the Universita’ di Roma La Sapienza, makes a specifically intriguing remark in this article: “The name Jacob “is plainly an artificial creation of post-exilic age [after the Babylonian Expatriation] It was not Jacob that became Israel, but Israel who became Jacob …”. These minimalists, that appear to stand for the majority of the archaeological community, do not concern the Scriptures as historically accurate. Among their objections: they do not believe that David, Solomon or Jacob existed and also don’t believe the Exodus ever occurred. These settings are as idealogically opposed to the traditional Christian sight of the Bible as one can image. So why should we (Christians) look for the advice of this group in the understanding of such a precious principle as the historical timeline of the Holy bible? Yet this is what has happened.

Here’s one more problem with relying on the scientific neighborhood to verify the Bible: they have “sensible” blinders on. Scientists that have no confidence in Christ are restricted in their capability to explore because they think that certain phenomena are difficult also prior to the examination has started. Since they consider themselves to be “logical” scientists the assumption that an “irrational” event has actually happened is implausible. The scientific method essentially permits any individual to make an assumption (any type of presumption), conduct research of known truths or run an experiment and utilize the study and/or the experiment to validate the assumption. These “reasonable” scientists when confronted with an “illogical” assumption simply jump over the research and experimental procedure and also declare that the presumption in void because they have actually presumed the “illogical” presumption is simply not possible. So why do these “reasonable” scientists behave in this manner? Well, think about the adhering to opportunity. Let’s claim that an “irrational” event is assumed as well as details is collected or an experiment is carried out to validate its validity. Let’s claim that the irrational event has been verified. What would certainly be the reaction of the “sensible” researcher? More than likely, total rejection. Such an end result would certainly create complete mayhem in his philosophy since his “logical” technique of examination, the scientific approach, would have been made use of to confirm that an “unreasonable” event was feasible. So what is an “irrational” event? It is simply an additional means of claiming a supernatural event, one that is beyond our understanding. Can the scientific procedure be made use of to verify an “irrational” event? Jesus Christ assumed so. Jesus was explaining this suggestion of being “birthed once again” to a Pharisee named Nicodemus in the New Testament (John 3:8): “The wind impacts where it wishes, and you below its sound, however you do not recognize where it comes from or where it goes. So it is with everybody birthed of the Spirit.” Nicodemus was clearly perplexed by this principle of being “birthed once more” yet Jesus was claiming that even if you really did not understood or believe this superordinary sensation could occur, much like something as abstract as the wind, there would be concrete evidence of it.

Absolutely not all researchers rely on this way, yet the terrific majority of them do. The number of these scientists will see the Scriptures without preconceived notions? When these researchers review in the Holy bible that the Earth was produced in seven days they will certainly not consider this as real because they have actually been trained that the universe is billions of years old. When these researchers review that a male lived to be 969 years of ages in the Holy bible they dismiss it as misconception or fairy tale because men don’t currently live to be that old. They will rule out the opportunity that at once in history men did live that long. When these guys review the account of Noah as well as a worldwide flood they have actually always attributed it to “regional” flooding. This might have some ring of reality to it because till that time, according to the Holy bible, the world was one big land mass (the world was all in one place, i.e., neighborhood). According to the Bible the continents didn’t split until the life of Peleg, a descendant of Noah. Once again, the researchers certainly are not mosting likely to concur with this concept of the land mass shift since they will certainly insist that this geological process required numerous years to suit the movement of the continental land masses. Since these archeologists disagree with Christians in a lot of essential issues described in the Holy bible just how will we ever before get to an agreement on a historic timeline?

Today chronological version of the Bible is based upon a blend of Biblical truth and also theoretical historical designs. I believe it is time that we take into consideration a new technique to Biblical chronology. The design I propose is based only on the information in the Bible. If the Christ in you the hope of glory Scriptures holds true then historians will certainly verify the result of the theologians (assuming the theologians have actually analyzed the Bible properly). Why should God’s Word need to be validated by men? If the Scriptures is genuinely trustworthy the fact of the Holy bible must be outlined for men to see and react to its fact. In 1995 David Rohl, an Egyptologist, wrote his publication A Test in Time to suggest a significantly various concept in chronology. He suggested a timeline that was based on some Scriptural evidence. As a matter of fact, Rohl’s suggested date of Solomon’s reign is consistent with the timeline created from my actual interpretation of the Scriptures. What is a lot more remarkable regarding David Rohl is that he is explained amongst excavators as a maximalist, someone that thinks the Holy bible is traditionally exact, yet he defines himself as a spiritual “agnostic”. If David Rohl is a maximalist then I am a “maximum” maximalist, somebody substantially to the right of David Rohl’s sight considering that I believe that the Holy bible is historically exact and without a doubt the extremely word of God as it declares to be. Therefore I believe my perspective on the chronology of the Holy bible is unlike anything you have ever before heard before.

The purpose of my publication, “The 4th Day: Why the Scriptures is Historically Accurate”, was to prove a scriptural idea that I think will synchronize the events taped in the Holy bible with Egyptian background, Babylonian background, Persian background as well as Archaeology. The recognition of this idea will certainly allow the reader to tie together all these areas of research study in one cool package to ensure that when seen together there is no inconsistency in between the Bible and also these various other elements of ancient background. The acknowledgment of this idea will additionally illustrate that the Scriptures is not just a credible religious document however a credible historic document because of its chronological accuracy. Initially, think that initially of development to the end of the millennial reign of Jesus Christ is a period of 7000 years; a period comparable to the 7 day duration of development of the world stated in guide of Genesis. Next, acknowledge that the sacrifice of the Passover lamb in the Old Testament is symbolic of the fact that Jesus Christ was crucified exactly 4000 years after the creation of the world. According to the Mosaic Law each family members that observed Passover was to purchase a lamb 4 days before the day of Passover and that lamb was to reside in that household up until the late mid-day of the day when the Israelite clergyman needed to compromise the lamb and also it was to be accomplished by nightfall. I believe these 4 days were God’s means of illustrating that the lamb of God, Jesus Christ, would certainly be given up on a cross 4000 years after the production of the world. For that reason, symbolically as well as in actuality, Jesus Christ was compromised on the 4th day.

When you acknowledge this idea to be true, numerous substantial verdicts pertaining to history become obvious. The Israelite Monarchies of David and also Solomon occurred about 180 years later than held by chroniclers. The duration of the Persian Empire from Cyrus the Great’s news of the rebuilding of Jerusalem until Alexander the Great’s invasion lasted just 21 years (not the about 200 year duration currently held by chroniclers). Egypt did not have a king (a Pharaoh) for 300 years between the 20th as well as 21st empires. I sustain these conclusions making use of the Holy bible, Astronomy, Archaeology, the writings of old chroniclers and also the monoliths of old kings.